Manchester City – Who is next after Carlos Tevez ?
Por Mani Honigstein

Now it is official what everyone had known for the last weeks. Carlos Tevez is going across town, from Manchester United to Manchester City. This time there can be no doubt it is clearly for the money. Tevez' story is in a way a das one and maybe one that reflects modern football best.


Tevez is "owned" by MSI (Media Sports Investment) which is controlled by Iranian businessman Kia Joorabchian. This is the main reason Tevez moved from Manchester United to City. There are a lot of people making a lot of money on that transfer. United wanted to keep Tevez, how badly? That is debatable, but they wanted to keep him. Now with Cristiano Ronaldo gone, Tevez would have probably gotten more playing time at United. But he and his owners opted otherwise.
City has still plenty of cash and it looks as they can make good use of it this summer. Most of the teams (including Manchester United) are short on cash and transfer amounts are not that high. This excludes obviously Real Madrid who are unstoppable on their sopping tour. In this kind of economic environment Manchester's money os worth even more.



So who is next to join City? Some rumors have been circulated in the last days about Emmanuel Adebayor, Xabi Alonso and Samuel Eto'o. I believe that both Xabi Alonso and Samuel Eto'o are likely. As for Eto'o all depends on how badly Fc Barcelona wants to get rid of him.

If City is to get Eto'o and Xabi Alonso they are on a good way to build a real team. And maybe, only maybe they can crack the Big Four in the Premiership.   
18  Comentarios
14.07.2009 15:39
Man City are spending well, but not enough to be a consistent side. As for Adebayor, if he leaves Arsenal, i leave with him unless they bring in a replacement of similar quality. How a club can sell it's best players and not improve on them and hope to win trophies is madness for me.
14.07.2009 15:41
@Stanley: I think these are difficult financial times for the clubs. In my opinion even Manchester United (although they do not say it out loud) are preserving cash, paying off debts rather than investing heavily in players. Arsenal might have similar problems. But in general Arsenal needs to decide whether they want to have a real shot at the Premiership title or not.
Por Adiveeth
14.07.2009 15:56
I think Adebayor out and Huntelaar in would be an ideal situation for Arsenal. Even Beckham I hear in on d Man City radar!!
Por Punkdunk
14.07.2009 16:31
ManCity never gonna be a big-four club. Specially without a good manager. As for Ade, I would say good riddance on Arsenals behalf. He is not commited to game or the club, but to money. We saw that last summer as well. Sell him and get Cesc the partner he deserves. Van Persie, Eduardo, Vela, The Russian Owl, Bendnter, Rosicky and Theo should have some goals in them as well.
14.07.2009 16:53
@Mani, i agree that cash is a stumbling block, but Arsenal can only get more cash by winning trophies. Many may not agree, but Adebayor's numbers speak for themselves, he was half committed and only scored 1 less goal than Van Persie in the league. Selling a prime asset and not getting an equivalent or improvement is a sign of lack of sporting ambition. It's a clear signal that financial concerns are superior to trophies, in that case, why devote so much emotional energy to watching your team play when they don't mean to get trophies, very hard to accept.
15.07.2009 08:17
@Punkdunk: Agree. Manchester City should have signed a top manager by now. @Stanley: Since you are a BVB Fan you should be used in not winning trophies...haha Seriously it is OK to support a club who does not have a chance of winning any titles. But at the end of the day a club should clearly state what their direction and ambitions are. Arsenal needs to ask themselves whether they want to have a chance for the title or not.
Por dmitri
15.07.2009 10:19
with Man City, they may seek to emulate Chelsea, but they dont understand that it took Chelsea almost ten years (from the days of Gullit) before Roman Abramovich purchased the club. if I was at Arsenal, id stick with these youngsters for another two seasons, max, before purchasing big names. that should be enough time to save lotsa cash, or enough playtime for today's youngsters to be sold at much higher price. who knows, maybe Messi or Aguero would wanna try the Emirates by then.
Por Punkdunk
15.07.2009 12:44
@Stanley: We don't want to keep a player who isn't interested in playing for our club or fans. He made it clear last summer that his priorities are cash. Getting close to 25 mill would be enough money to get that midfielder we really need, because we allready got goalscorers.
Por Punkdunk
15.07.2009 12:52
Besides, if Wenger do sign Chamakh for 8 mill, then Ade is replaced with still more cash to spend. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGGS45XzYew&feature=related
Por Michael
15.07.2009 13:21
Mani -- I absolutely loved the BVB trophies part...But what is Man City gonna do with sooo many strikers ??? No point in playing like Real Madrid , few years back ..you score 3 we will score 4...Arsenal, seriously Wenger is beginning to loose it...
15.07.2009 16:55
Haha, Mani you got me there on the BVB quip haha! You are right, the management talk about winning but paying 40% more than Utd-Chelsea-Liverpool and not having it reflected on the pitch means the should answer to the fans and tell us the truth instead of keeping quiet. @ Punkdunk, money is not the issue, sporting ambitions are, £25m is not a good deal when you consider Arsenal are selling to the richest club in the world, and Berbatov was sold for £31m. Which quality striker can be bought for £25m, when the only onesleft are only on sale for 'crazy prices', you don't win trophies selling your players so easily.
15.07.2009 16:56
@Michael: I would not say Wenger is loosing it, but he does not know which direction to go. He reminds me a bit of Felix Magath who I really respect, but both seem to be a bit too afraid to buy big names. Arsenal might be short of cash now, but they had the chance to make a move some years ago. @Dmitri: Good point. It took Chelsea a while to build the team. More impressive was that they bought a team and not only big names.
15.07.2009 16:59
@Stanley: No offense re. Dortmund, but I could not resist making that comment :) And unfortunately and more than ever, money is the main issue for clubs.
15.07.2009 18:26
@Mani, it's not too bad for Arsenal though, just see the stories from Milan, they have received €80m and still can't afford to spend €25m! It's also an issue about chicken and the egg, you gain more by winning trophies and getting supporters, you lose money by not winning trophies and losing supporters. I know they are two different leagues, but Porto sell and replace instantly, Lyon have sold and replaced instantly, Arsenal seem to sell and replace with inferior quality that they hope will develop.
15.07.2009 22:44
@Stan: AC Milan's transfer activity clearly states that they are ambitious when it comes to balancing the books...Everything they do is intended to reduce the wage bill ...Generally speaking I am in favour of good finances, but I wouldn't be surprised if Milan's new strategy backfires and they miss out on the CL spot next season.
16.07.2009 07:53
@Daniel: It is a difficult situation. I take the Dortmund example again. They were a great team then came financial difficulties and since they could not really recover. It was their end for a whole decade. This is why I think Uli Hoeness at Bayern is so unbelievable. He gets way less money from TV than in Spain or Italy or the UK and still Bayern has a solid foundation. AC Milan looks completely lost these days.
Por Dan K
16.07.2009 09:14
@Mani - I dont think City will get their hands on Alonso. City will continue to pick up some great players, but those great players will be in a certain situation (looking for a new club, not sure where their future lies). I'll use Gareth Barry and Carlos Tevez as examples, but they can be joined by Robinho and Eto'o (if he was to join). Robinho was lured by the fact that he needed to leave Madrid and wasn't going to get his "dream" move to Chelsea. Barry was on his way out of Villa but his "dream" move to Liverpool never materialised. Tevez would, I am sure have preferred to stay at Utd, but for one reason or another, that didn't quite work out. And the same goes for Eto'o. That's why I don't think Alonso would move to City. He would move to Real, but if that doesn't happen, there is no reason for him to trade in Liverpool.
22.07.2009 00:06
@Mani:I really admire Honess as well. But sometimes I think it would be better if he was less influential in certain matters (transfers of players for instance). I think what Bayern needs is a team manager model similar to the English one. And I think that Bayern - despite the ridiculously low TV revenues - is not only in a solid position but far better off than the likes of Arsenal or Liverpool when it comes to spending power. That is, of course, a result of Hoeness' excellent work, but the question is: can Bayern's financial power be transformed into a squad that reflects Bayern's wealth on the pitch?
Connect to Facebook and start sharing your passion with your friends
Al hacer clic en "Agregar Comentario", estas aceptando que el post no viola los Términos de Uso de Footbo. Agregar Comentario